MMA-Torrents.com Forum
https://foru.mma-torrents.com/

[SPOILERS] Pacquiao vs Bradley After Talk!
https://foru.mma-torrents.com/viewtopic.php?f=74&t=4651		 Page 1 of 2
Author:  NiN505 [ Sun Jun 10, 2012 7:13 am ]
Post subject:  [SPOILERS] Pacquiao vs Bradley After Talk!
I know most of you follow MMA but Pacquiao along with Mayweather remains one of the biggest names of combat sports known today. I was looking forward to the fight. Media pundits predicted a tough matchup and even thought Bradley would win after Pacquiao's display against Marquez in his last fight. I thought Pacquiao would win it via UD. After the fight ended I was left speechles...

People claim that MMA judging is awful (and it is...) but in this case and other recent fights in boxing it has been HORRIBLE calls. I scored the fight for Pacquiao 118-110 giving Bradley rounds 8 and 10. At worst Pacman lost 4 rounds and that's the ABSOLUTE worst.

Here's how the judges had it:

Image


In a matter of context Pacquiao was a 200-1 favorite entering the last round in terms of betting.

I also added a poll above to gauge the reaction of the fight. Any Bradley backers here?
Robbery or not? I'll let you be the judge of that.
Author:  coenvg [ Sun Jun 10, 2012 7:27 am ]
Post subject:  Re: [SPOILERS] Pacquiao vs Bradley After Talk!
I bribed the judges \m/
Author:  NiN505 [ Sun Jun 10, 2012 7:49 am ]
Post subject:  Re: [SPOILERS] Pacquiao vs Bradley After Talk!
coenvg wrote:
I bribed the judges \m/


Bob Arum what you doing here? :P
Author:  dolcca [ Sun Jun 10, 2012 2:32 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: [SPOILERS] Pacquiao vs Bradley After Talk!
this reminds me of amir vs petterson robbery, then they have rematch to see who really won the last fight which means "making big money". this is same case for manny vs bradley, they want to do rematch to make big money again. did you see bob arum being so happy after the decision??you gotta check that guys lol!the biggest robbery in boxing history!
Author:  NiN505 [ Mon Jun 11, 2012 11:14 am ]
Post subject:  Re: [SPOILERS] Pacquiao vs Bradley After Talk!
Williams-Lara in NJ was awful, along with Rios-Abril were the more recent horrible decisions. Just a shame!
Author:  jnrpepaseed [ Mon Jun 11, 2012 7:08 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: [SPOILERS] Pacquiao vs Bradley After Talk!
NiN505 wrote:
Williams-Lara in NJ was awful, along with Rios-Abril were the more recent horrible decisions. Just a shame!

this...

i had it close as in bradley rounds 1 n 2 and pac 3 to 9 then bradley n pac close in last few.. wasnt landslide like hbo said was close but pac won
Author:  dolcca [ Mon Jun 11, 2012 8:18 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: [SPOILERS] Pacquiao vs Bradley After Talk!
jnrpepaseed wrote:
NiN505 wrote:
Williams-Lara in NJ was awful, along with Rios-Abril were the more recent horrible decisions. Just a shame!

this...

i had it close as in bradley rounds 1 n 2 and pac 3 to 9 then bradley n pac close in last few.. wasnt landslide like hbo said was close but pac won


it's all about making money $$ baby!! lets do rematch to earn more money again, bob arum is the real judge in boxing i guess...
Author:  3X [ Tue Jun 12, 2012 4:46 am ]
Post subject:  Re: [SPOILERS] Pacquiao vs Bradley After Talk!
Desert Storm won bush said so :!: :!: :!:
Author:  Dent [ Tue Jun 12, 2012 10:35 am ]
Post subject:  Re: [SPOILERS] Pacquiao vs Bradley After Talk!
I watched the fight with one eye but I could hear the (worst ever?) commentators talk a lot about how good Pacman looked. So I was really suprised when he didnt win. But then who really won? I think MMA did :mrgreen: Boxing is just... boring.
Author:  dolcca [ Tue Jun 12, 2012 12:00 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: [SPOILERS] Pacquiao vs Bradley After Talk!
Dent wrote:
I watched the fight with one eye but I could hear the (worst ever?) commentators talk a lot about how good Pacman looked. So I was really suprised when he didnt win. But then who really won? I think MMA did :mrgreen: Boxing is just... boring.


boxing is boring because they extended the fight to 12 rounds rofl. which means that, boxers will spend his full energy after round 4 or 5. for the first 3 rounds, it's just analyzing your opponent which really sucks. if they put the fight to 5 rounds, we would always see exciting fights cause boxers will not have much time to analyze and jab jab to win some points, it's all about who throw lot of punches... ::r&r::
Page 1 of 2 All times are UTC
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/