MMA-Torrents.com Forum
https://foru.mma-torrents.com/

NSAC: Diaz hearing possible for April, past multiple offenders issued yearlong suspension
https://foru.mma-torrents.com/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=4298		 Page 1 of 1
Author:  NiN505 [ Fri Feb 10, 2012 9:14 am ]
Post subject:  NSAC: Diaz hearing possible for April, past multiple offenders issued yearlong suspension
Image




The Nevada State Athletic Commission is likely to hear the case of Nick Diaz sometime in April, according to NSAC Executive Director Keith Kizer.

For now, Diaz is temporarily suspended following a disciplinary complaint filed by the NSAC to the Nevada Attorney General that states the fighter broke rule 467.850 of the commission's administrative code when he tested positive for marijuana metabolites following UFC 143.

At the NSAC's next meeting on Feb. 22, Kizer will ask the commission to uphold the temporary suspension until the formal hearing in April, where Diaz is expected to answer to the complaint.

Rule 467.850 bars the use of banned substances including performance-enhancing drugs and drugs of abuse such as marijuana.

Kizer today notified MMAjunkie.com (www.mmajunkie.com) of Diaz's positive test. The former Strikeforce welterweight champ was one of 18 athletes who were tested for drugs of abuse and performance enhancers following the pay-per-view event, which took place this past Saturday at the Mandalay Bay Events Center in Las Vegas.

Diaz lost a unanimous decision to Carlos Condit in a bout for the UFC interim welterweight title. He subsequently said he would retire from the sport following the fight.

On Tuesday, UFC president Dana White said a rematch between Diaz and Condit was in the works, but a day later, Diaz manager Cesar Gracie said the fight was a no-go.

Among the possible punishments Diaz faces, Kizer said the commission could levy fines, suspend him, as well as revoke or place conditions on the license.

"In the past, the norm for a positive test for marijuana is six months, but we have had two repeat offenders and they both got a 12-month suspension," he said. "But that doesn't necessarily mean that's what will happen here."

UFC president Dana White issued a brief official statement but did not comment specifically on the UFC's plans for Diaz.

"I am beyond disappointed that he tested positive for marijuana," White stated. "It is now in the hands of the Nevada State Athletic Commission.”

Gracie declined comment when reached today.

Meanwhile, Condit's manager, Malki Kawa, said his client's next move is currently unclear. The interim champ is set to meet with UFC officials on Friday to determine his immediate future.




Source: NSAC: Diaz hearing possible for April, past multiple offenders issued yearlong suspension
Author:  NiN505 [ Fri Feb 10, 2012 9:17 am ]
Post subject:  Re: NSAC: Diaz hearing possible for April, past multiple offenders issued yearlong suspension
Well so much for a possible rematch or even a Diaz vs GSP titlefight...
Not that I'm pro weed or anti weed, still don't get how weed is a performance booster the same way other substances are.
Author:  Dent [ Fri Feb 10, 2012 2:37 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: NSAC: Diaz hearing possible for April, past multiple offenders issued yearlong suspension
If someone asked me you can fight this guy, either without him doing anything or after he smoked weed.
If it was an important fight I would defenitely go for fighting him after he smoked weed.
It should put down his lung capacity and adrenaline and make him a slower and less coordinated fighter.

So whats the deal, now it is illegal to use performance decreasing drugs too?
Like a high jumper would be punished for carrying weights?

Im serious.

So if someone is found to have eaten macdonalds before the fight, isnt that even worse then smoking weed?
Should fighters now not be allowed to smoke tabacco or drink wine?

Its ok when they test guys for performance ENHANCING drugs, but they should let the fighters use any recreational drug that is legal on their own terms,
and marihuana is legal in california, and Diaz even has a paper that says he has the right to use it.

To me its just the liquor and tabacco companies lobbying because they see their market threatened by a softer drug that doesnt cause as much problems, that they dont control yet, and worst of all, is controlled by brown people, something they dont see kindly on in tennesee and virginia in the mansions.

But now after that rant, the fact is that it is illegal so not much do do about it.
Author:  NiN505 [ Fri Feb 10, 2012 3:32 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: NSAC: Diaz hearing possible for April, past multiple offenders issued yearlong suspension
Dent wrote:
If someone asked me you can fight this guy, either without him doing anything or after he smoked weed.
If it was an important fight I would defenitely go for fighting him after he smoked weed.
It should put down his lung capacity and adrenaline and make him a slower and less coordinated fighter.

So whats the deal, now it is illegal to use performance decreasing drugs too?
Like a high jumper would be punished for carrying weights?

Im serious.

So if someone is found to have eaten macdonalds before the fight, isnt that even worse then smoking weed?
Should fighters now not be allowed to smoke tabacco or drink wine?

Its ok when they test guys for performance ENHANCING drugs, but they should let the fighters use any recreational drug that is legal on their own terms,
and marihuana is legal in california, and Diaz even has a paper that says he has the right to use it.

To me its just the liquor and tabacco companies lobbying because they see their market threatened by a softer drug that doesnt cause as much problems, that they dont control yet, and worst of all, is controlled by brown people, something they dont see kindly on in tennesee and virginia in the mansions.

But now after that rant, the fact is that it is illegal so not much do do about it.




+100 on this.
The most worrying thing is that these are the same people that ban steroids (rightfully so...) and yet lets Testosterone Replacement Therapy roam *facepalm*
Guys like Marquardt, Henderson, Sonnen, Duffee as much as I respect them as fighters shouldn't be fighting. If you need an extra boost to bring to normal levels you can't be in the sport. Shows how much more mainstream MMA has to be to compared to these other sports. But hey again just my honest own opinion.
Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/