MMA-Torrents.com Forum https://foru.mma-torrents.com/ |
|
Strikeforce Heavy Artillery Competition [RESULTS] (updated) https://foru.mma-torrents.com/viewtopic.php?f=44&t=1877 |
Page 1 of 2 |
Author: | subvertbeats [ Fri May 21, 2010 4:55 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Strikeforce Heavy Artillery Competition [RESULTS] |
(Edit by Dent: There was a bug that has been resolved, if you dont understand the next few posts go directly to the results, they are correct) Just a confirmation that this is indeed the cause of the bug. I'll look to address it with an update, but we have a workaround to prevent it from happening in future comps anyway. |
Author: | Dent [ Fri May 21, 2010 7:28 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Strikeforce Heavy Artillery Competition [RESULTS] |
Thank you very much Subvertbeats for resolving this issue! I will proceed in sorting this out so that each person gets the correct points/belt. |
Author: | Kamara666 [ Fri May 21, 2010 7:42 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Strikeforce Heavy Artillery Competition [RESULTS] |
Great work subs |
Author: | Dent [ Fri May 21, 2010 8:15 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Strikeforce Heavy Artillery Competition [RESULTS] |
All right! I have counted the correct picks manually using the PDF. These are the results I get: 5/5 _____________ einarst 5/5 feli2 5/5 spoeke 5/5 knopman 5/5 Lanfeare 5/5 lenoz 5/5 Xsjado 5/5 PMBR 5/5 4/5 _____________ Kamara666 4/5 Santana 4/5 JonnyMuzz 4/5 hsu9540 4/5 chris 4/5 painday1 4/5 lfyk86 4/5 subvertbeats 4/5 beau420 4/5 al-209 4/5 newaza 4/5 tomwlms 4/5 feichar64 4/5 Lynfast 4/5 spastik 4/5 coenvg 4/5 royce 4/5 Dragonfoxy 4/5 kenoh 4/5 sebmorrison 4/5 Pirate 4/5 Jtrain 4/5 tokoloshex 4/5 letham 4/5 _Shogun_ 4/5 nialeem 4/5 1-3/5 _____________ doggy870 3/5 jab123 3/5 sharmos 3/5 ObSkewer 2/5 sixdemonbag 3/5 3TIMES 3/5 amazinggoldenboy 3/5 Jason123420 1/5 jnrpepaseed 2/5 Nezerous 1/5 bearockbrobama 2/5 Tygeryg 3/5 Audiotroll 3/5 kyodemon24 3/5 mortisia 3/5 gorecki 2/5 Furuya 3/5 weech 3/5 Cazzo 3/5 braboftw 3/5 xavve 2/5 BVandDietPepsi 3/5 IamStuUngar 3/5 jonyv 3/5 autopi0ton 3/5 keittop 3/5 two7sclash 2/5 nowaytofail 3/5 Advocatus 2/5 nutzizme 3/5 texavery 2/5 thatsgold 1/5 vlada 2/5 goosechase 3/5 joshm850 2/5 Skippy666 3/5 You have 24 hours to complain if you think that I have counted your picks wrong, then I will award the belts and GB's to the winners above. Once again thank you all, Subvertbeats and all the members that have competed for helping out to solve this and get it correct, and thank you for the patience w00t |
Author: | Dragonfoxy [ Fri May 21, 2010 10:55 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Strikeforce Heavy Artillery Competition [RESULTS] |
Even though I am sad to lose my belt, I have recounted as well and compared it with Dent's counts and all should be fine now. Congratz to the winners and great heads up to Subvertbeats for finding the bug. Now you see even better how well our staff works together and solves problems that our dear members find |
Author: | coenvg [ Sat May 22, 2010 8:33 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Strikeforce Heavy Artillery Competition [RESULTS] |
It's good to see my memory still works Congratualations to the new winners! |
Author: | subvertbeats [ Sat May 22, 2010 9:05 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Strikeforce Heavy Artillery Competition [RESULTS] |
Ok, just to conclude this... Ive cleaned up the database, and re-submitted the answers.....everyone has the correct points in the league table now... Just to confirm the output: Quote: QUIZ ID: 26 QUIZ NAME: Strikeforce Heavy Artillery
Xsjado (correct: 5, incorrect: 0) spoeke (correct: 5, incorrect: 0) feli2 (correct: 5, incorrect: 0) knopman (correct: 5, incorrect: 0) einarst (correct: 5, incorrect: 0) PMBR (correct: 5, incorrect: 0) lenoz (correct: 5, incorrect: 0) Lanfeare (correct: 5, incorrect: 0) painday1 (correct: 4, incorrect: 1) royce (correct: 4, incorrect: 1) coenvg (correct: 4, incorrect: 1) newaza (correct: 4, incorrect: 1) chris (correct: 4, incorrect: 1) tokoloshex (correct: 4, incorrect: 1) kenoh (correct: 4, incorrect: 1) spastik (correct: 4, incorrect: 1) Pirate (correct: 4, incorrect: 1) hsu9540 (correct: 4, incorrect: 1) al-209 (correct: 4, incorrect: 1) Jtrain (correct: 4, incorrect: 1) Lynfast (correct: 4, incorrect: 1) beau420 (correct: 4, incorrect: 1) lfyk86 (correct: 4, incorrect: 1) letham (correct: 4, incorrect: 1) nialeem (correct: 4, incorrect: 1) tomwlms (correct: 4, incorrect: 1) Dragonfoxy (correct: 4, incorrect: 1) feichar64 (correct: 4, incorrect: 1) subvertbeats (correct: 4, incorrect: 1) JonnyMuzz (correct: 4, incorrect: 1) Kamara666 (correct: 4, incorrect: 1) _Shogun_ (correct: 4, incorrect: 1) Santana (correct: 4, incorrect: 1) sebmorrison (correct: 4, incorrect: 1) weech (correct: 3, incorrect: 2) doggy870 (correct: 3, incorrect: 2) jab123 (correct: 3, incorrect: 2) goosechase (correct: 3, incorrect: 2) autopi0ton (correct: 3, incorrect: 2) IamStuUngar (correct: 3, incorrect: 2) kyodemon24 (correct: 3, incorrect: 2) jonyv (correct: 3, incorrect: 2) keittop (correct: 3, incorrect: 2) 3TIMES (correct: 3, incorrect: 2) nutzizme (correct: 3, incorrect: 2) mortisia (correct: 3, incorrect: 2) Skippy666 (correct: 3, incorrect: 2) sharmos (correct: 3, incorrect: 2) Cazzo (correct: 3, incorrect: 2) Furuya (correct: 3, incorrect: 2) nowaytofail (correct: 3, incorrect: 2) Audiotroll (correct: 3, incorrect: 2) BVandDietPepsi (correct: 3, incorrect: 2) braboftw (correct: 3, incorrect: 2) sixdemonbag (correct: 3, incorrect: 2) amazinggoldenboy (correct: 3, incorrect: 2) Tygeryg (correct: 3, incorrect: 2) Dent (correct: 3, incorrect: 2) texavery (correct: 2, incorrect: 3) gorecki (correct: 2, incorrect: 3) bearockbrobama (correct: 2, incorrect: 3) Advocatus (correct: 2, incorrect: 3) xavve (correct: 2, incorrect: 3) ObSkewer (correct: 2, incorrect: 3) vlada (correct: 2, incorrect: 3) joshm850 (correct: 2, incorrect: 3) jnrpepaseed (correct: 2, incorrect: 3) two7sclash (correct: 2, incorrect: 3) Nezerous (correct: 1, incorrect: 4) thatsgold (correct: 1, incorrect: 4) Jason123420 (correct: 1, incorrect: 4) SQL Query entered |
Author: | subvertbeats [ Sat May 22, 2010 9:15 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Strikeforce Heavy Artillery Competition [RESULTS] |
Ive also now confirmed that this is the first time this happened - all previous comps were not affected by this bug. |
Author: | Dragonfoxy [ Sat May 22, 2010 1:48 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Strikeforce Heavy Artillery Competition [RESULTS] |
Awesome work subvert. I need a hug now, I lost my shiny belt *sniff* |
Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |